[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000517#comment-15000517 ]
Alexandre COLLIGNON edited comment on JCRVLT-61 at 11/11/15 3:30 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi [~tripod], We're currently evaluating the possibility to define AccessControl handling on a per entry level which will offer a more fine-grained definition. We're considering these three options: - insert first - replace - append Do you think it's worth implementing both or should we consider it as a good replacement of this issue? was (Author: acollign): Hi [~tripod], We're currently evaluating the possibility to define AccessControl handling on a per entry level which will offer a more fine-grained definition. Do you think it's worth implementing both or should we consider it as a good replacement of this issue? > Allow AccessControllHandling be defined per filter root > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JCRVLT-61 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-61 > Project: Jackrabbit FileVault > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Packaging > Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra > > the current packaging only allows to specify the AccessControllHandling per > package. if one requires different behaviors for different content trees, the > only workaround today is to create sub-packages. > it would be nice if the ac-control handling can be defined by workspace > filter root, similar to the iImportMode - or even tie the > AccessControllHandling to the ImportMode. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)