[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17033803#comment-17033803
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on JCRVLT-407:
----------------------------------------

Just take the following file
{code}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jcr2:root xmlns:jcr2="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0"; xmlns:rep="internal"
    jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured">
    <jcr2:content  jcr2:primaryType="nt:unstructured" >
    <jcr2:system/>
</jcr2:root>
{code}
IMHO the namespace prefix in the repository should be independent of the prefix 
used in the XML (which is already supported for property names, but not yet for 
node names).

> DocView XML: Proper namespace support for node names during import
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-407
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-407
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: vlt
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.2
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.4.4
>
>
> Currently any DocView files is processed by the DocViewSAXImporter which 
> creates in the end nodes in the repository via 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L800.
>  That just takes {{DocViewNode}} as parameter. Unfortunately the node name is 
> only contained there in its qualifed (i.e. prefixed) form 
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.2%20Qualified%20Form).
>  In case the XML uses other prefixes than the underlying JCR the namespaces 
> won't be correctly resolved, as the node creation happens in 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/e05e3fc8031eb08f6d0815316ec7fff3367df53c/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/impl/io/DocViewSAXImporter.java#L1050
>  with just the qualified form.
> I would propose that the DocView node uses the expanded form 
> (https://docs.adobe.com/docs/en/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.1%20Expanded%20Form)
>  for node names, similar to property names!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to