[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17740566#comment-17740566
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on JCR-4945:
--------------------------------------

Please compare with 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11906?focusedCommentId=17740111&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17740111.
 IMHO we should just rather try to get rid of all dependencies to SLF4J outside 
the main package {{org.slf4j}} which is evolved in a backwards compatible way.

Feel free to chime in on 
https://jira.qos.ch/browse/SLF4J-579?focusedId=21673&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-21673.

> Ensure OSGi-enabled Jackrabbit bundles deploy in environments featuring only 
> Slf4j v2 or even Tika v2.8
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-4945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4945
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: jackrabbit-it-osgi
>            Reporter: Manfred Baedke
>            Assignee: Manfred Baedke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: jcr-4945.patch
>
>
> While Jackrabbit only requires slf4j-1.7, it should also run with slf4j 
> >=2.0.0 and even tika-core >=2.5 (which requires slf4j-api-2.0.0).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to