Joscorbe commented on code in PR #1328:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1328#discussion_r1515274804
##########
oak-run/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/run/RevisionsCommand.java:
##########
@@ -74,15 +89,18 @@ public class RevisionsCommand implements Command {
private static final Logger LOG =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(RevisionsCommand.class);
+ private static final int REVISION_CAP = getInteger("oak.revision.cap",
250);
+
private static final String USAGE = Joiner.on(System.lineSeparator()).join(
"revisions {<jdbc-uri> | <mongodb-uri>} <sub-command> [options]",
"where sub-command is one of",
" info give information about the revisions state without
performing",
" any modifications",
- " collect perform garbage collection",
- " reset clear all persisted metadata",
- " sweep clean up uncommitted changes",
- " detailedGC perform detailed garbage collection i.e. remove
unmerged branch commits, old revisions, deleted properties etc"
+ " collect perform garbage collection",
+ " reset clear all persisted metadata",
+ " sweep clean up uncommitted changes",
+ " detailedGC perform detailed garbage collection i.e. remove
unmerged branch commits, old revisions, deleted properties etc",
+ " pathCleanup clean up old/unused revisions and unmerged
branch commits on a specific path"
Review Comment:
That's possible, yes, and would be cleaner IMO. Since the `--path` is
already a separated argument we can simply apply it to this command.
My only concern with this approach is, if the `path` argument is missing, it
could end up running the DetailedGC in all the repository.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
