[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18051914#comment-18051914
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on JCRVLT-831 at 1/15/26 2:53 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
After some heroic brainstorming with [~jhoh], we actually understand what was
wrong (in ordered collections, sibling nodes namespace prefixes indeed are
needed).
I'll come up with a test case next (EDIT: -> JCRVLT-834), and then proceed with
the optimization.
was (Author: reschke):
After some heroic brainstorming with [~jhoh], we actually understand what was
wrong (in ordered collections, sibling nodes namespace prefixes indeed are
needed).
I'll come up with a test case next, and then proceed with the optimization.
> For collection of namespace prefixes, avoid iterating over sibling nodes not
> contained in the filter(s)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCRVLT-831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-831
> Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: vlt
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> It appears that the changes for JCRVLT-789 improved the performance for
> exporting the *content*, however the phase of collecting namespace prefixes
> does not use that optimzation.
> (TBD: write a test)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)