You'd only use one or the other, depending on your Java version.
If you're a 1.4 person, you'd use Ensure.that(...). If you're on Java 5, you'd do a static import of Ensure and then have ensureThat(...) available. Just don't spend too much time looking in the Ensure.java file itself - you'll go blind :)
Cheers, Dan Shane Duan wrote:
I tried but it looked weird to have Ensure.that() and Ensure.ensureThat() at the same place. On 12/5/06, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:You already can. UsingMiniMock has exactly those methods. I just haven't added them to Ensure yet. Feel free to add them - it'll save me a small chore :) Cheers, Dan Shane Duan wrote: > Ah. Thanks for the explanation. > > Are we going to add it now? In this way, people who are using Java5 > can use this style right now. > > On 12/5/06, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's what I meant - sorry, didn't explain it very well. >> >> In Ensure we will have pairs of methods, called that(...) and >> ensureThat(...) for each signature. That way, 1.4 folks can do >> Ensure.that(...), and 1.5 people can statically import Ensure and use >> ensureThat(...). >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
