"Shane Duan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/03/2007 18:17:25:
> I remember the idea was to use the pattern that Cotta is using but > pull the code into jbehave namespace so that there will be no > dependency. > > Shall I do that? I can pull them under org.jbehave.util.<something> > Hi Shane, I'm afraid I couldn't make head nor tail of the pattern, which (together with them being unused) was why I removed them rather than extracting cotta. Also, when we were using them we were running up to 3 duplicates of some behaviour classes; I'd be wary of this happening again. If we can ensure that we don't have duplicates, and maybe include some javadocs to help explain how they work, I'd love to see them back in again. Cheers, Liz. -- Elizabeth Keogh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.livejournal.com/users/sirenian
