Hi Ajay,

3.7.2 has been released with these fixes - will be synched to Maven Central in the next few hours.

Cheers

On 15/10/2012 12:44, अजय सिंह wrote:
Dear Mauro,

Both the defects (JBEHAVE-839 <https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-839> and JBEHAVE-841 <https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE-841> )have been verified to be working with 3.8-snapshot.
Appreciate your good work

Regards
Ajay

On 15 October 2012 14:06, Mauro Talevi <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org <mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>> wrote:

    Yes, replace version and test please.



    On 15 Oct 2012, at 08:24, अजय सिंह <sir...@gmail.com
    <mailto:sir...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hello Mauro,

    If you dont mind, could you be more explanatory about how should
    I test this. I mean shall I replace 3.6.8(defect version) with
    3.8-snapshot and test.

    Regards
    Ajay

    On 15 October 2012 00:21, Mauro Talevi
    <mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org <mailto:mauro.tal...@aquilonia.org>>
    wrote:

        Hi Ajay,

        the two bugs that you raised are fixed in 3.8-SNAPSHOT
        (uploaded to
        https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/)

        If you can verify that they work for you we can cut a 3.7.2
        release:
        https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JBEHAVE/fixforversion/18853

        Cheers


        On 13/10/2012 18:45, Mauro Talevi wrote:
        Hi this is bug, please raise a JIRA issue for it.

        Thanks!

        On 12/10/2012 11:21, अजय सिंह wrote:
        Hi,


        In case of sceanrio level given story as follows:

        Meta:
        @storyName my.story

        Scenario: This is second scenario
        Meta:
        @index 1
        @dummy
        GivenStories: test.story


        Given execute given for second scenario
        Then execute then for second scenario




        Even when the GivenStory[test.story] fails, the execution
        continues with the next steps in the calling story[ie
        my.story]. which should not be the case..
        Is there any work around provided out of the box?



        Regards
        Ajay





Reply via email to