Hi Ignasi, By cumbersome and not good, I mean requires lots of configurations for simple serializations and additional coding to compared to Jackson and still after those the results can be not as expected :-)
Thanks for the help offer, I will contact you if the problem persists. Regards, Timur On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you detail what "cumbersome" and "not good" mean in your case and > what issues are you experiencing? > > Gson is a core dependency in jclouds and currently there is not an easy way > to change that. Many components assume Gson, and I'm not sure adding > Jackson just for a single provider would be a good idea (even if the dep > resides only in the provider). We should try to have one common way to > serialize/deserialize (this gains importance when having to maintain all > providers and deal with the particularities of each one). > > Serialization should be as easy as building the java domain objects > matching the json model. Are you having trouble with that? > > I can help with this either in this thread or in the IRC if you prefer > (you'll find me as nacx). > > HTH! > > Ignasi > El 24/11/2013 07:57, "Timur Sungur" <[email protected]> escribió: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a short question. Can I add Jackson dependency for json processing? >> >> Using Gson is more cumbersome and results are not that good with >> respect to Jackson. >> >> I'm using it to serialize and de-serialize domain specific objects. >> >> Regards, >> >> Timur >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Everett Toews >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I don't know if this was from the same person but the same question came >> up on StackOverflow [1]. I answered it there and most of it was cribbed >> from Ignasi comments [3]. Thanks again, Ignasi! >> > >> > I invite you all to edit my answer on SO and when were happy with it, >> I'll copy it into the wiki and maybe we can get this question answered once >> and for all. ;) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Everet >> > >> > [1] >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19571901/information-about-jclouds/19592104#19592104 >> > >> > >> > On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Timur >> >> >> >>> Could you please tell me how do you accept contributions and what still >> >>> needs to be done so that this contribution can also reside with >> existing >> >>> providers? >> >> >> >> Thanks for contributing! The basic details can be found on the >> "Contributing to jclouds" page [1]; one important thing to note for new >> providers is that the pull request should be opened against the >> jclouds-labs repository [2]. >> >> >> >> For some very useful style and implementation tips, see Ignasi's recent >> comment to a different "new provider" pull request [3]. Thanks again, >> Ignasi! >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> ap >> >> >> >> [1] >> http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/devguides/contributing-to-jclouds/ >> >> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs >> >> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/188#issuecomment-26856785 >> > >>
