You can submit your contributions regardless of where the project is. We happily accept contributions in all repos! :) El 14/01/2014 19:00, "Inbar Stolberg" <[email protected]> escribió:
> I agree with everet and i have a some contributions for v1 once it made its > way to the main jclouds project... > On Jan 14, 2014 7:55 PM, "Everett Toews" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I don't think there's any harm in keeping the v1 API around, apart from > > the maintenance (of which there hasn't been any). > > > > The fact that the Image Service API v1 Reference is still linked to from > > the OpenStack Docs [1] tells me that it's still in use and hasn't been > > deprecated. As such we should still support it. > > > > When there are two versions, we should probably default to v2 to > encourage > > the use of the newer API but still make it trivially easy to switch to > the > > v1 API. > > > > Everett > > > > [1] http://docs.openstack.org/ > > > > > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Jeremy Daggett wrote: > > > > > Hi Ignacio, > > > > > > This is great news on the Glance v2 API! > > > > > > My preference would be to completely remove the v1 API (since it was > > never > > > promoted from the labs project) and just move forward with v2. I can't > > > imagine that anyone is even using the v1 API at this point, but I could > > be > > > wrong... > > > > > > If others on the list can provide additional perspective here, it would > > be > > > greatly appreciated. Thx! > > > > > > /jd > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Ignacio Mulas Viela < > > [email protected] > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all! > > >> Hopefully, I will put for review some of the glance v2 API this week > or > > >> next at the most. Sorry for the delay here! :-) > > >> > > >> Just a question here, do you want to maintain the v1 classes and > package > > >> structure and create aside the v2 version or should I remove v1 > > completely > > >> and substitute it for the v2? Any guidelines to follow here? > > >> > > >> /Ignacio > > >> On 14 Jan 2014 17:16, "Jeremy Daggett" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> [redirecting response to [email protected]…] > > >>> > > >>> From: Jeremy <[email protected]<mailto: > > >>> [email protected]>> > > >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > < > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM > > >>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> Subject: Re: Openstack glance - incubation > > >>> > > >>> Hi Avi, > > >>> > > >>> The Glance v1 API is essentially irrelevant at this point, which is > why > > >>> the code is still in incubation in “jclouds-labs-openstack". As soon > as > > >> the > > >>> v2 API has been implemented and is promoted to the APIs in the > jclouds > > >>> proper repository (/apis) will it be considered “production” ready. > > >>> > > >>> The intent is that the v2 API will be supported going forward. We do > > have > > >>> a JIRA [1] for supporting this API, and there was a related > discussion > > >>> about this on the dev@ list [2] recently. > > >>> > > >>> HTH, and we welcome patches! ;) > > >>> > > >>> /jd > > >>> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-379 > > >>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/sp6l72szns3nfe3s > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> From: Avi Ben-Harush <[email protected]<mailto: > > >>> [email protected]>> > > >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > < > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 8:19 AM > > >>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>> Subject: Openstack glance - incubation > > >>> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I've noticed that glance is still in incubation, even though it's > been > > >>> there since nova. > > >>> > > >>> I expected that 1.7 release would include a "production" glance since > > it > > >>> is a basic functionality for any nova operation. > > >>> > > >>> why is glance still in incubation? > > >>> when glance "production" is planned? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Avi Ben-Harush > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
