On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Benson, > > Thanks for the comments. > > On 11/06/12 15:16, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> I don't understand the remark about sdb and larq. Are you just noting >> that the tag tags them even though you are not releasing them?
Thanks. When I first read it, I misread the n.b. to refer more broadly than the tag, but even after rereading I decided it was worth checking. > > > Yes. mvn release:* tags everything as in SVN so even though the build had > had jena-sdb and jena-larq cleared out of the way, the tagging caught them. > > So the SVN tag is a superset of the source-release - the SVN tagged source > tree builds the same as the release (jena-sdb and jena-larq aren't in the > module list of the top level POM). > >> Also, you need three PMC members, formally, not just three committers >> (which is only important is the list is different). > > > Point taken. In our case, it's not different. > > Andy > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Andy Seaborne<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.1. >>> >>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >>> (We do need at least 3 committer +1's.) >>> >>> >>> This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki. >>> >>> Versions: >>> >>> jena-parent 1 >>> jena-iri 0.9.1 >>> jena-core 2.7.1 >>> jena-arq 2.9.1 >>> jena-tdb 0.9.1 >>> apache-jena 2.7.1 (the combined distribution) >>> >>> jena-fuseki 0.2.2 (separate binary) >>> >>> Staging repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-222/ >>> >>> Proposed dist/ area: >>> http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.1/dist/ >>> >>> Keys: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >>> >>> SVN tag: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.1/ >>> >>> NB. This picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. >>> The source-release does not; jena-sdb and jena-larq are >>> not included in the build. >>> >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >>> >>> This vote will be open to the end of >>> Thursday 14/June 23:59 UTC >>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> Checking needed: >>> >>> is the GPG signature fine? >>> is there a source archive? >>> can the source archive really be built? >>> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >>> (both source and binary artifacts)? >>> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >>> check the dependencies. >>> do all the tests work? >>> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources? > >
