On 6/14/12 12:58 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 13/06/12 23:46, Rob Vesse wrote: >> Yes particularly in the context of components like ARQ there are a lot >>of >> bug and performance fixes plus other minor enhancements that I and >>others >> have worked on. >> >> For the record ARQ hasn't received a new release in 6 months so while >> there are clearly some TDB issues to be resolved it is best to get a >> release out the door to get the fixes to that and other components into >> the hands of users. > >And even for TDB, it's been getting on for 4 months and the last version >was a major change with the introduction of transactions. Ditto Fuseki >(3 months) which incorporated TDB. > >> More frequent releases should hopefully be a lot easier now we are a TLP >> and don't have quite so many hurdles to jump through to get our release >> done (we now only have to hold a successful release vote ourselves >>rather >> than also having to pass through the Incubator process) > >All true though the biggest time-sink has been migration. The Apache >process added a few days of latency but much of the time/resource has >gone in set-up; change of infrastructure, much (much, much) better >licensing clarity on the codebase. > >Releases will get increasingly easier ... and PMC members know how to >check and vote (hint, hint!) Yes I am going to take a look at it today hopefully Still snowed under with work and the joys of filling out US government forms which are the most impressive achievement in bureaucracy that the western world has ever made ;-) Rob > > Andy
