+1 License and Notice are present and correct Signatures check out Source archive builds SVN Tag builds All tests pass on OS X
Rob On 10/20/12 10:13 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.4. > >Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > >This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki. > >Versions: > >jena-parent 4 >jena-iri 0.9.4 >jena-core 2.7.4 >jena-arq 2.9.4 >jena-tdb 0.9.4 >apache-jena 2.7.4 (the combined distribution) > >jena-fuseki 0.2.5 (separate binary) > >Staging repository: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-148/ > >Proposed dist/ area: >http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-2.7.4/ > >Keys: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-2.7.4/KEYS > >SVN tag: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.4/ > >NB. The SVN tag picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well >but they are not included in the build. > > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open at least until: > > 23:59 Tuesday 23rd October 2012 > >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > >Checking needed: > > does everything work on MS Windows? > does everything work on OS X? > is the GPG signature fine? > is there a source archive? > can the source archive really be built? > is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
