Hi, It was what I tried. Doesn¹t work, Pellet returns error.
MBA On 02/12/13 14:26, "Dave Reynolds" <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I don't have access to Pellet so can't construct a complete example, but >all I meant was something like: > > Model myPelletModel = ... > GenericRuleReasoner reasoner = new GenericRuleReasoner(rules); > InfModel inf = ModelFactory.createInfModel(reasoner, myPelletModel); > >Dave > >On 02/12/13 13:57, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >> Dear Dave, >> >> Thanks for your answer. Can you give a short example how I can put a >>jena >> rule-based inference model on top of a Pellet-backed model? I tried to >> combine both but I didn't had success. >> >> Miguel >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Dave Reynolds >><dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On 02/12/13 11:23, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> Jena does not provide OWL2, correct? >>>> >>> >>> Correct. >>> >>> >>> My problem is that I want to use OWL2 inference, specifically to the >>>> qualified cardinalities inference (for instance, and is just an >>>>example, >>>> my class IronMan is defined as all sportsman that plays at least 3 >>>> sports). With Pellet I can do OWL2 inference but I can't combine with >>>>jena >>>> rules. In my problem, jena rules are useful because I can develop >>>>built-in >>>> functions. >>>> >>>> Some questions: >>>> >>>> There are somehow to combine OWL2 inference with jena rules? >>>> >>> >>> If your data is static then you may be able to put a jena rule-based >>> inference model on top of a Pellet-backed model. >>> >>> >>> Do you know somehow to implement qualified cardinalities in jena? >>>> >>> >>> I wouldn't recommend trying that. The lack of unique name assumption >>>means >>> that counting how many distinct things you have or can infer is very >>>tricky >>> in a simple rule based system. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >> >
