The RMI simply exposes an existing graph implementation on a remote system.
The normal disclaimers apply but given the standard Jena configuration: NodeFactory.createAnon() uses UID to create an id that would be passed to the graph on the remote server where the anon would be recreated. The result is that both the client and the server have the same anon id for the blank node. Am I missing something? Claude On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29/12/13 16:58, Claude Warren wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I have an initial implementation of an RMI based Graph that allows one JVM >> to access a graph in a different JVM. I hope to extend this to the Model >> level in the near future. I just wanted to know if anyone was interested >> in this project. >> >> Claude >> >> > The perennial question ... > > How do you treat blank nodes? > > Andy > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web<http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
