My vote is +1
---- Checking Done: + does everything work on MS Windows? Not Checked + does everything work on OS X? Yes + is the GPG signature fine? Source Archive - Yes, MD5 and SHA1 checksum also correct Binary Archives - Yes, MD5 and SHA1 checksums also correct + is there a source archive? Yes + can the source archive really be built? Yes + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? Source Archive - Yes Binary Archives - Yes + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? Yes + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? Yes Rob On 18/01/2014 21:24, "Andy Seaborne" <a...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.11.1 (with Fuseki artifact >1.0.1). > >Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > >Staging repository: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1001/ > >Proposed dist/ area: >http://people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.11.1-dist/ > >Keys: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >SVN tag: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.1/ > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open to the end of > > Tuesday, 21st January 2014, 23:59 UTC > >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > >Checking needed: > >+ does everything work on MS Windows? >+ does everything work on OS X? >+ is the GPG signature fine? >+ is there a source archive? >+ can the source archive really be built? >+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? >+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
