[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14041234#comment-14041234
 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-721:
------------------------------------

A flag added along the lines of your patch.

The switch is in SystemTDB. There are dire warnings in the javadoc.

Two alternative names : {{com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.store.enableInlineLiterals}} and 
{{tdb:store.enableInlineLiterals}}.  Set via 
{{-Dtdb:store.enableInlineLiterals=false}}; must be set before the JVM starts 
up.

No specific tests - I did run TestNodeid with this false and got failures as 
expected but that's the limit of testing.

Please confirm.



> Inline literals, source types are discarded
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-721
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-721
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: TDB
>    Affects Versions: TDB 1.0.1
>            Reporter: Marek Kowalczyk
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 2.12.0
>
>         Attachments: JENA-721.patch
>
>
> NodeId.inline$ changes the actual type of literals from subtypes of 
> xsd:integer  to xsd:integer, for instance: literals of type 
> xsd:positiveInteger are stored ad inline type INTEGER and during read decoded 
> as xsd:integer in NodeId.extract(NodeId)
> {code}
>  case INTEGER:
>             {
>                 long val = IntegerNode.unpack(v) ;
>                 Node n = NodeFactory.createLiteral(Long.toString(val), null, 
> XSDDatatype.XSDinteger) ;
>                 return n ;
>             }
> {code}
> It would be nice to add support for various xsd:types and use the 7 bits 
> reserved for inline type to represent more than 7 types.
> As a fastest workaround I've disabled the inline literals in NodeId( using 
> reflection) , but it would be great If it would be configurable via context 
> or parameter in StoreConnection.make(); or via SystemParams



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to