Seems to make sense. I use schemagen and maven, but I don't use the plugin. Rather I use "exec-maven-plugin" combined with "build-helper-maven-plugin" as described at [1].
-Stephen [1] https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tools/schemagen.html On Tuesday, July 1, 2014, Ian Dickinson <i.j.dickin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > To do exactly what you suggest, all we need to do is revert my change; > > the build-helper-maven-plugin is already a way to add a directory to > > the source roots via pom config. > > > > However, I have a more complex idea to offer you: > > > > Maybe redundancy is not redundancy. > > > > We tell users: If you want to just produce sources to include in the > > build, you use my new top-level property as the single source root, > > and we will add it to the build, and all will be well. If you want to > > do something more complex, you can use the older scheme, and it's up > > to you to arrange for it to compile, perhaps using the > > build-helper-maven-plugin. > > > > To make this really painless, we'd need one more boolean property: > > useOutputDirectory. Default is false, preserving old behavior. Set to > > true, gets new behavior, respecting new property. > > > > WDYT? > I can see your logic. OK, since you're the one with the active use > case, and since no-one has commented at all on users@, I'm in favour > of you proceeding as you suggest. > > Any one else? > > Ian >
