Hi Andy, yes, my last update was 6 days ago following my mail from 16/07, where I inform that I finished the implementation in all engine modes.
As I need to do a lot of tests, I use a local clone of Jena for developing. When I finish any step, I put in the repository the “clean” code (Cleaned from code developed but that is not being used). Miguel On 24 Jul 2014, at 15:58, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > So how's it going? I was asking because the repo does not seem to have > changed in 6 days - ie. since before your email on 22/July > > Andy > > On 24/07/14 14:37, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> yes, the repo is updated. >> >> Miguel >> >> On 24 Jul 2014, at 14:15, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Miguel, >>> >>> Is github.com/mbentoalves/jena up-to-date? >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> On 22/07/14 12:45, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >>>> Hi Andy, >>>> >>>> in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a >>>> non-issue. However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL >>>> command can produce new data that can be false when new deductions are >>>> performed. I will deepen my study and, if necessary, prepare a show case. >>>> >>>> My next steps, will be try to hook sparql commands with rule terms in a >>>> rule. >>>> >>>> Miguel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 16:22, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 19/07/14 00:10, Miguel Bento Alves wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I did a new update in my repository >>>>>> (https://github.com/mbentoalves/jena). I implemented Sparql commands in >>>>>> rules in hybrid and forward mode. Now, we can define sparql commands in >>>>>> rules in all engine modes (backward, forwardRETE, hybrid, forward). >>>>>> Rules with a sparql command only can have 1 body term, the sparql >>>>>> command himself. I removed the constraint that a rule with a sparql >>>>>> command only can have 1 term in the head. Therefore, it is possible >>>>>> something like: >>>>>> (\\\sparql >>>>>> Select ?x ?z >>>>>> where {?x <eg:p> ?y . ?y <eg:p> ?z .} >>>>>> \\\sparql) -> (?x <eg:p1> ?z) (?z <eg:p2> ?x). >>>>>> >>>>>> (only in forward mode, of course, because backward mode doesn't allow >>>>>> more than 1 head term). >>>>>> >>>>>> Next, I will try to hook a sparql command with other terms in a rule. >>>>>> >>>>>> Miguel >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Miguel, >>>>> >>>>> Now it works with the RETE engine, is the issue of executing SPARQL >>>>> queries once (email of 16/July) a non-issue? >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
