+1
+ does everything work on Linux?
yes
+ does everything work on MS Windows?
+ does everything work on OS X?
+ is the GPG signature fine?
yes
+ are the checksums correct?
yes
+ is there a source archive?
yes
+ can the source archive really be built?
yes
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
yes
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
yes
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
N/A
+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
yes
Congratulations!
--------------------
Non-blocking, minor comment:
The NOTICE does not need the "Portions of this software were ..." part.
In this module, there are no parts from elsewhere. No harm, just
unnecessary.
Because this is distributed just as a jar in maven, there is no
dependencies being shipped which means things are simpler.
The LICENSE and NOTICE in the jar are autogenerated and are fine. The 2
NOTICE files have different titles. The jar one is taken from <name> in
the POM.
(I have updated the NOTICE and POM files in SVN).
Andy
On 15/08/14 21:17, Ying Jiang wrote:
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release of jena-csv 1.0.0 (JENA-625, GSoC 2014)
http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/csv/
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.)
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1004/
Proposed dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~jpz6311whu/jena-csv-1.0.0/
Keys:
http://people.apache.org/~jpz6311whu/jena-csv-1.0.0/KEYS
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-csv-1.0.0
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Tuesday, 18th August, 2014 23:59 UTC
(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC).
Checking needed:
+ does everything work on Linux?
+ does everything work on MS Windows?
+ does everything work on OS X?
+ is the GPG signature fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?
+ can the source archive really be built?
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
Best regards,
Ying Jiang
