Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/55#issuecomment-98179500
Totally up to you. It's all clear to me and I don't require to parcel it
out, but that's because I've been knee-deep in it. {grin}
If you think it would make for a clearer evolution in the record, then
sure, let's slice it up into logical moves. The method rename would be a little
more granular than I would like to get. Perhaps maybe these steps:
- Change method names, extend `Filter` to `Predicate`, massive use of
`Predicate` instead of `Filter`.
- Switch from explicit construction of `Predicate`s to lambda-syntax.
- Manipulations to iterators to improve the readability of filtering and
make it look more like stream processing.
What do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
