Hi, I added the grammar draft at the end of [1]. There're actually minor changes on the grammar of ConstructQuery, which are marked red. Much of the grammar from SPARQL INSERT can be reused, related to Quads. Any comments?
regards, Qihong [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KiDlfxMq5ZsU7vj7ZDm10yC96OZgdltwmZAZl56sTw0 On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Ying Jiang <jpz6311...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Qihong, > > Your grammar in the proposal is not formal. Why not compose a BNF/EBNF > notation one, so that others can provide more accurate comments? e.g, > the WHERE clause for the complete form and short form are quite > different. No complex graph patterns are allowed in the short form). > > Best regards, > Ying Jiang > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Qihong Lin <confidence....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ying, >> I'll stick to the list for discussion. Thanks for your guide! I >> re-created a fresh new branch of JENA-491, which did not contain hp >> package any more. >> >> Andy, >> You mention that the GRAPH grammar needs revisions. Please check the >> following ones. I add the short form. Am I missing anything else? >> >> Complete form: >> >> CONSTRUCT { >> >> # Named graph >> >> GRAPH :g { ?s :p ?o } >> >> # Default graph >> >> { ?s :p ?o } >> >> # Named graph >> >> :g { ?s :p ?o } >> >> # Default graph >> >> ?s :p ?o >> >> } WHERE { ... } >> >> Short form: >> >> CONSTRUCT { >> >> } WHERE { ... } >> >> regards, >> Qihong >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ying Jiang <jpz6311...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Qihong, >>> >>> As Andy mentioned, the bonding period is for community bonding, not >>> just mentor bonding. I can help you with JavaCC for the project. But >>> much more work needs comments and discussions with others in the >>> community. For example, Andy just pointed out the design issue and the >>> timeline changes. It's required for you to think about it and make >>> revisions accordingly. If any questions, just ask on the mailing list. >>> You'll get answers from the right one, not just from me. >>> >>> It seems that your JENA-491 branch still uses com.hp.hpl.jena. Have >>> you re-checked out the latest code? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Ying Jiang >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Hi Qihong, >>>> >>>> One of the reasons there is a community bonding period is to create the >>>> right social context for the work rather than just being about technical >>>> work. As other people may be working on the areas you need to modify, this >>>> will help avoid problems. >>>> >>>> Discussions should be on this list and there has been nothing. Discussions >>>> are also here to help you. It's a large codebase, and some of it quite >>>> old. >>>> It makes it hard to see what's important and what's not. >>>> >>>> When it comes to decisions, the Apache catchphrase is "if it isn't on the >>>> list, it does not exist". Given that the Jena development community only >>>> exists via this list, you'll appreciate that this is quite important. >>>> Please discuss with Ying about regular (minimum, weekly) on the list. >>>> >>>> There are some changes to the plan if the javacc work is done first. Alos, >>>> we have discussed a revised design with GRAPH inside the CONSTRUCT >>>> template. >>>> Don't forget the case of CONSTRUCT WHERE { } shorthand form. >>>> >>>> What does the timeline look like with these revisions? That changes the >>>> "Week 1 - Week 3" slot. Some of that freed up time should go to announcing >>>> the changes on the users@ list, I suggest just after the mid term >>>> evaluation. >>>> >>>> You will have noticed that the package structure in ARQ has changed. There >>>> is no com.hp.hpl.jena anymore, it's all moved under org.apache.jena. You >>>> are probably better off starting from a clean clone of Jena. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >>>> On 24/05/15 14:12, Qihong Lin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for my late response. During the community binding period, I >>>>> studied the JavaCC grammar with my mentor's help. Now, I know how to >>>>> use JavaCC in this project. >>>>> A new branch of JENA-491 [1] has just been set up. I'll code there in >>>>> the first place, and finally merge the code into jena master. >>>>> >>>>> In all, I think everything is ready. Let's begin coding! >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Qihong >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/confidencesun/jena/tree/JENA-491 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/05/15 11:52, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28/04/15 13:09, Ying Jiang wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FYI, Google announced the accepted projects of GSoC 2015 yesterday. A >>>>>>>> Jena project of "Extend CONSTRUCT to build quads (JENA-491) [1] is >>>>>>>> among them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Ying Jiang >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KiDlfxMq5ZsU7vj7ZDm10yC96OZgdltwmZAZl56sTw0/edit#heading=h.fwbztdn0y3zl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the plan for the bonding period? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ping? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>
