[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15022349#comment-15022349
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-626:
-------------------------------------
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/95#issuecomment-158980337
I'm honestly more and more confused about the design here, using
`CacheAction` and `CacheEntry`. It seems that the same work could be
accomplished more clearly either by using Jena's extant cache types (properly
parameterized) or even just a good `Map` implementation, relying on
`Map::computeIfAbsent`.
> SPARQL Query Caching
> --------------------
>
> Key: JENA-626
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-626
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Saikat Maitra
> Labels: java, linked_data, rdf, sparql
>
> Add a caching layer to Fuseki to cache the results of SPARQL Query requests.
> This cache should allow for in-memory and disk-based caching, configuration
> and cache management, and coordination with data modification.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
