[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15101636#comment-15101636
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1118:
--------------------------------------
Github user osma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/122#issuecomment-171934539
Hmm, there are several LICENSE files in the Jena source tree which mention
"code contributed by Plugged In Software". It appears that some of these have
old pathnames referring to `com.hp.hpl.jena` packages which have since been
renamed:
```
$ grep ExtendedHandler `find . -name LICENSE`
./LICENSE:src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
./jena-sdb/dist/LICENSE:src/main/java/com/hp/hpl/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
./jena-core/LICENSE:src/main/java/com/hp/hpl/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
./jena-core/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE:src/main/java/com/hp/hpl/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
./jena-core/target/classes/META-INF/LICENSE:src/main/java/com/hp/hpl/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
./apache-jena/LICENSE:src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdf/arp/ExtendedHandler.java
```
As you can see above, this affects not only the jena-sdb/dist/LICENSE file
but also jena-core and apache-jena.
> Bringing back the SDB assembly (zip/tarball distribution)
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1118
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1118
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SDB
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.0.1
> Reporter: Osma Suominen
> Assignee: Osma Suominen
> Priority: Minor
>
> I've been using the ancient jena-sdb-1.3.6 distribution but it's getting old.
> I wanted to have something newer to deploy to my server but compiling SDB
> using "mvn package" only builds the jar, not a full distribution with the
> command line scripts etc.
> I noticed that the Maven assembly plugin configuration to do this was
> commented out from jena-sdb/pom.xml in commit 807f8bf on 16 Feb 2014 and
> later removed entirely. Maybe there was a good reason to do so, I don't know.
> The assembly.xml file has since bitrotted slightly since it references files
> that no longer exist.
> In any case I'd like to have it back in working condition and I will open a
> PR shortly to do that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
