+1. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 8 Nov 2016 1:56 pm, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta. >> :-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even quite >> soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice. >> >> It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into all sorts of places >> like written down in JIRA and email. >> >> Andy >> >> On 08/11/16 13:26, Claude Warren wrote: >> >>> Should we wait for the change that causes the version jump first. I would >>> think that we would have 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT and then *if* JENA-1250 causes an >>> incompatible change jump the version to 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT >>> >>> But I can go either way >>> >>> +0 >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Osma Suominen <[email protected] >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> 08.11.2016, 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> >>>> Should the next version be 3.2.0? >>>>> >>>>> The Lucene file format may well change. >>>>> >>>>> If we want that, I'll go and update the POM versions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> +1 for calling it 3.2.0. >>>> >>>> Yes, the Lucene upgrade (JENA-1250) will very likely go into the next >>>> release in some form and change the Lucene index on-disk format. >>>> >>>> -Osma >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Osma Suominen >>>> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist >>>> National Library of Finland >>>> P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) >>>> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO >>>> Tel. +358 50 3199529 >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.nationallibrary.fi >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>
