This is already a roadbump for jena-text. There is only so much
development bandwidth so if it is already a version that jena-text users
are going to have to get involved in, so making considered small API
changes at the same time seems the right thing to do. Deprecation only
goes so far (people ignore the warnings!).
I don't know the usage well enough and don't currently use jena-text.
get() seems odd, updateEntity I can image might be used
** ping Chris/Brian @Epimorphics **
Andy
On 16/03/17 15:29, A. Soroka wrote:
Sorry for my thickness, Andy, but are you saying that it makes sense to go
ahead and make all the changes together, to avoid presenting a moving target
for any longer than we have to?
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
This is a major jump for jena-text so getting in changes in the next version
makes sense to me.
Andy
On 16/03/17 10:50, Osma Suominen wrote:
Hi,
In the process of developing the Elasticsearch backend for jena-text
(JENA-1305), Anuj and I noticed that the methods "get" and
"updateEntity" in the TextIndex interface in jena-text are never called
from within Jena (not even from unit tests). Is there a reason for
keeping them, or should I just remove them from the interface and its
implementations?
-Osma
