[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15996729#comment-15996729
]
Stephen Owens commented on JENA-1332:
-------------------------------------
Thanks Andy, this lead to a robust discussion about SPARQL evaluation order and
binding. The end result is, we agree and we learned something. I'll close the
issue as invalid.
> Possibly incorrect results from SPARQL with union and filter not exists
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1332
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1332
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.2.0
> Reporter: Stephen Owens
> Attachments: JenaFilterNotExistsUnionTest.java
>
>
> The test case attached to this issue shows an unexpected SPARQL result. We
> found the result while optimizing some SPARQL that had poor performance with
> some OPTIONAL clauses. We thought the optimization was the same as the
> original but in version 3.2.0 the result differs, it worked in 3.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
