Prefixes are not part of SPARQL Update.
On 03/06/17 14:36, Claude Warren wrote:
I am starting with the second example in the SPARQL recommendation:
https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#example_2
I construct a model with the "data before" data.
I construct an UpdateRequest as per the snippet
I execute
UpdateAction.execute( updateRequest, model);
should the model reflect the "data after" data? Specifically, should the
additional prefix be added to the prefix mapping.
I can see arguments for it not working with remote systems but it seems to
me that local models should be updated to include the prefix mapping. Was
this a design decision or is it a bug?
Claude
