Andy,

Is there a branch for the java 9 work?  it looks like the
maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems.  As I recall there were several
enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).

I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
it looks like it continues to run anyway.

Claude

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Claude,
>
> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
>
> but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
>
> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
> minimally compile?
>
>     Andy
>
> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes  but am having significant
>> problems running java at all.
>>
>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
>> several plugins that did not work.  I think it would be faster to set up a
>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>>
>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop  the branch and may start over
>> again in the future.
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>>
>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>>
>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>>
>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>>
>>>          Andy
>>>
>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it.  I have not
>>>> merged
>>>> in the last big batch of changes.  but take a look.  I got it to compile
>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work.  I will be
>>>> looking at that shortly.  I also removed (commented out)
>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>>> and
>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>>
>>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>>
>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
>>>> basic
>>>> build functionality works.
>>>>
>>>> Repository is at  https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>>
>>>> Claude
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene.  He
>>>>>
>>>>>> indicted
>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> Java 9.  He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this.  I'm not
>>>>>> certain
>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>>
>>>>>      Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to