Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/314
Okay, then let's break this thing up, as you describe above. Your number 2
and 3 are uncontroversial. As for number 1, sure, I want that fix too, but this
PR (#314) didn't do just that. It also conflated the assembler RDF for these
two types of dataset and I now see that TIM's use of `ja:data` for two purposes
is a big part of that. Let's revert this and merge #313 instead and we can take
up JENA-1445 after 3.6.0.
---
