ok Andy, I will prepare for the removal of jena spatial from the jena project. but since I use jena spatial in production it will take a while to switch and I will stay with 3.10 here. what exactly will you do with the code base? just remove the code from the fuseki release and the jena spatial folder in the source?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:17 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > We have three major streams outstanding. > Have I missed anything? > > 1/ GeoSPARQL > 2/ Prometheus metrics > 3/ ​SurroundQueryParser > > == GeoSPARQL > > Greg - apologies for being tardy on this one. It looks in good shape. > Did you hear from anyone after the request for feedback? > > This is two modules: geosparql-jena and geosparql-fuseki > > A suggestion for how to proceed if you have the time for 3.11.0 is that > we include these basically as-is and remove jena-spatial from Fuseki > which we have been signalling for a while. > > Suggestion: > > jena-geosparql > jena-fuseki/jena-fuseki-geospatial > > and under org.apache.jena.geosparql and org.apache.jena.fuseki.geosparql > > It would have to be maven. > > Documentation: > This does not have to timed with the release though desirable to have > some instructions on the website. > > Looking the modules, it has its own specialised Fuseki incarnation with > command line arguments and also internally a system wide configuration. > maybe, later, we might want to merge the Fuseki setup but exactly how > and whether separate is better for users due to the specialised nature > can wait. Release should get feedback after it is incorporated - > "release early, release often". > > Greg - how does that sound? > > PMC - having more eyes on this would be helpful. > > If the timing is OK, we can work on details on the ticket JENA-664 (or > email on dev@). > > == JENA-1691 : Prometheus metrics > > This is getting there. We have the code worked out, the packaging needs > a bit of discussion; importantly it is missing L&N changes due to > BSD-binaries in the combined jars mean some L&N changes. > > == JENA-1690 : ​SurroundQueryParser > > Looks like this is ready and waiting for someone to merge it. > > > With all that, it looks like some things to sort out. > > We can wait a bit longer for 3.11.0, or do 3.11.0 fairly soon with > whatever is ready, including getting things in and expect to further > refine, then advance the timing on 3.12.0. > > Thoughts? > > Andy > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
