Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480739946 After reviewing the licensing documentation in the libraries and Apache's policy on public domain licenses ( http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#handling-public-domain-licensed-works) I think we can safely include them as we would any other Apache approved license. To my mind this means adding a line or two to the Notice file indicating that the two components are included and are licensed under the createive commons public domain license. This may be a bit of overkill, but better safe than sorry. Claude On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 4:53 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > A link in LICENSE is better and acceptable these days. HdrHistogram and > LatencyUtils binaries artifacts themselves don't include a LICENSE or > NOTICE file (these would automatically get rolled up by the shader). > > This is the LICENSE to end up in the convenience binaries, not the Jena > one; nothing to do there - no "other license" source in the jena source > codebase. And because it is the convenience binaries, and licenses with no > attribute requirement, do we need to do anything? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480602750>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACU6nsUwPa171J5_JmaqNPn8of-U3Dgpks5vehRvgaJpZM4bDW9i> > . > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
