[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16919541#comment-16919541 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1742: ------------------------------------------------------- Commit 6d0b1ddf4ad8e4af982e5c00e46342a43c2e3fa7 in jena's branch refs/heads/master from Aaron Coburn [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=6d0b1dd ] Merge pull request #594 from apache/JENA-1742 JENA-1742: Fix OSGi imports > Fix OSGi imports > ---------------- > > Key: JENA-1742 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1742 > Project: Apache Jena > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: OSGi > Affects Versions: Jena 3.12.0 > Reporter: Aaron Coburn > Priority: Major > Fix For: Jena 3.13.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > The Jena 3.12.0 OSGi artifact introduces two new, unused package imports: > com.google.appengine.api and com.google.apphosting.api > It is a little unclear to me where these are pulled from, but they certainly > are not used anywhere in the runtime code. In all likelihood, they are an > optional transitive dependency, but they make it harder to run Jena in an > OSGi context. > I would suggest adding an explicit exclusion for these packages in the OSGi > module. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)