I am still using my old GeoSPARQL implementation with the new Apache Jena libs on the GeoSPARQL.org endpoint. I will have to find some time to further evaluate and possibly switch over to your new GeoSPARQL module early in the new year.
The OGC GeoSPARQL team has invited me to participate in the discussion about a new OGC GeoSPARQL 2.0 specification later in the month. Will be interesting to see how the use of geospatial features will evolve in the RDF ecosystems in 2020. If you are interested to join these meetings please let me know. Best, Marco On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 1:30 PM Greg Albiston <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for this Marco. Interesting to see it all in action. > > Apache Jena GeoSPARQL does quite well. > > I've ran the benchmarking dataset against Jena 3.13.1 for the one query > they said didn't give results. > It does give results and in a couple of seconds as reported for the other > systems so unsure what has happened there. > > Cheers, > > Greg > On 04/12/2019 14:00, Marco Neumann wrote: > > FYI here is a new review / comparison that mentions the new Apache Jena > GeoSPARQL effort in this recent publication: > > Assessment and Benchmarking of Spatially Enabled RDF Stores for the Next > Generation of Spatial Data Infrastructure > > by Weiming Huang,Syed Amir Raza,Oleg Mirzov and Lars Harrie > > ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8(7), 310; > https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8070310 > > > Enjoy, > Marco > > -- > > > --- > Marco Neumann > KONA > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
