[X] +1 Approve the release

Build from tag passing with mvn clean test install -Pdev, on:


Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe; 
2018-06-18T06:33:14+12:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.4
Java version: 13, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: 
/home/kinow/Development/java/jdk-13
Default locale: en_NZ, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "4.15.0-74-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"


Executed Fuseki from within Eclipse, and tested uploading an RDF I used 
recently with Skosmos. Ran a couple queries, everything worked fine.


No issues with Fuseki either.


Had a look in the dist area, sources and binaries look OK, NOTICE date updated. 
(by the way, tar.gz+zip for binaries, but only zip for sources, but I don't 
think it matters?).


Checked signatures of dist area and found no issues.


Cheers
Bruno



    On Tuesday, 14 January 2020, 5:23:36 am NZDT, Andy Seaborne 
<a...@apache.org> wrote:  
 
 Hi,

Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 3.14.0
This is the first proposed release candidate.

==== Changes:

https://s.apache.org/jena-3.14.0-jira

==== Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1035

Proposed dist/ area:
  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
  https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/19d42a5

Git Commit Hash:
  19d42a57a9debc675047b2d1ce9769979c43e7d8

Git Commit Tag:
  jena-3.14.0

Please vote to approve this release:

        [ ] +1 Approve the release
        [ ]  0 Don't care
        [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

    Thursday, 16th January 2020 at 187:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

      Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
          (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
          (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
            if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
  

Reply via email to