+1 (binding)

Checked signatures
Github tag matches
Built from github tag and source release with both JDK 8 and 11
Checked JDK 11 (module) compatibility
Checked OSGi artifacts
The fix for JENA-1817 addressed the issue I reported earlier

Aaron


On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:52, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
>      Andy
>
> On 16/01/2020 17:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 3.14.0
> > This is the second proposed release candidate.
> >
> > The deadline is only 72hours in case there are enough +1 votes and I can
> > do the final stage on Sunday - otherwise, it is likely to be mid next
> week.
> >
> > ==== Changes from RC1:
> >
> > Fix for JENA-1817
> > https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/08ca0b83
> >
> > ==== Changes for 3.14.0:
> >
> > https://s.apache.org/jena-3.14.0-jira
> >
> > ==== Release Vote
> >
> > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> > Please download and test the proposed release.
> >
> > Staging repository:
> >    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1036
> >
> > Proposed dist/ area:
> >    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
> >
> > Keys:
> >    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Git commit (browser URL):
> >    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d0abcd14
> >
> > Git Commit Hash:
> >    d0abcd14f82c36045a3c047941a6518f3bdb56ce
> >
> > Git Commit Tag:
> >    jena-3.14.0
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >          [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >          [ ]  0 Don't care
> >          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > This vote will be open until at least
> >
> >      Sunday, 19th January 2020 at 18:00 UTC
> >
> > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> > for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
> > and we can extend the vote period.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >        Andy
> >
> > Checking needed:
> >
> > + are the GPG signatures fine?
> > + are the checksums correct?
> > + is there a source archive?
> >
> > + can the source archive really be built?
> >            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
> >            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
> >             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>

Reply via email to