+1
Glad to see progress on this
Rob
On 21/02/2020, 18:38, "ajs6f" <aj...@apache.org> wrote:
With the same interpretation, +1, and thanks very much to Roy for looking
into this!
ajs6f
> On Feb 21, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Interpreting as a general "in principle" to move website content ... no
timeline and (obviously) subject to new information becoming available.
>
> +1
>
> PMC - please vote and not leave to LAZY to indicate you are aware this is
work-in-progress.
>
> Andy
>
> On 19/02/2020 13:41, Roy Lenferink wrote:
>> Hi Jena community,
>> After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a vote for moving over
from the current Apache CMS
>> (and SVN) to use Hugo and git :)
>> Short recap about Hugo: Hugo is a static site generator which is already
having more stars on
>> GitHub than Jekyll. It is easy to get started with (single static binary
without dependencies) and it is
>> really doing well performance wise.
>> [ ] +1 for moving over from the Apache CMS / SVN to Hugo / Git.
>> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion on this
>> [ ] -1 for not moving over, in this case please explain why
>> This vote will be open for the usual 72 hour period. Lazy consensus
applies: if no -1 votes are being
>> cast within the voting period, the vote passes.
>> Best regards,
>> Roy
>> [1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1a46369ea6e9df4f0b0971934563b9e8433cb33fe42290240969bbe0%40%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E
