Hi all,
as usual when I see something regarding Jena in recent publications: "Benchmark for Performance Evaluation of SHACL Implementations in Graph Databases" [1] As the title indicates, it's a benchmark about SHACL validation performance. The benchmark comprise 58 SHACL shapes tested on I guess 1 million triples. Jena got second place close to Stardog - which I think is a success. Some other metrics like memory consumption might be something to investigate - not sure if those numbers make sense, but according to the paper Jena needs 14GB of RAM? RDF4J even 16GB, but Stardog only 1.2GB. A weak point of Jena was "lack of documentation". Anyways, good job Andy (and contributors). Happy to see comments and thoughts from your side. Cheers, Lorenz [1] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57977-7_6
