[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185046#comment-17185046
]
Jan Rosecky commented on JENA-1947:
-----------------------------------
Thanks Andy, I understand that. I thought the intended behaviour of the shacl
validator might be to detect recursive shapes, print out an error/warning and
(potentially) be able to still continue - which is why I've raised that as an
issue here. If you think the current behaviour on the Jena side of things is
fine, you can close this issue now.
> SHACL validator: Stack overflow on recursive shapes even if deactivated
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1947
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1947
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SHACL
> Reporter: Jan Rosecky
> Priority: Major
>
> I'm trying to validate using a set of shapes including:
> [http://purl.allotrope.org/shapes/adm/core/REC/2020/06/common.shapes] .
> af-s:AFS_0000001 has a recursive sh:and(af-s:AFS_0000001) clause, which
> causes a stack overflow exception - even though the shape is sh:deactivated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
