I don't think it is working properly though, looking at https://infra-reports.apache.org/site-source/ we're currently getting a mix of .asf.yaml published content and gitpubsub published content. I think your fake file just allowed it to continue to pick up the old gitpubsub content. To get the Javadoc displayed on the staging branch I created I had to add the content/ prefix as seen in the PR I opened - https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/60 - when I was missing the content/ prefix I did not get any Javadoc on the staging site. Of course it is possible we need both fixes, a file there to trigger the sub-directory creation and the .asf.yaml changes
I think to fully test "staging" requires some more changes. We'd need to have the Jenkinsfile that lives on main have a Staging stage that would push to the staging branch rather than the asf-site branch when building not on main. I can also get a PR for that out today as well Rob On 21/06/2021, 11:38, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: On 21/06/2021 11:35, Rob Vesse wrote: > Yeah I think the parameters may not be set up right. I'm experimenting with a staging site right now and think I'll have a fix shortly It is working now. I can test "staging" with the ShEx documentation. Andy > > Rob > > On 21/06/2021, 09:27, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Aaron - should be back now. > > Rob - > > I reverted the .asf.yaml change on the javadoc branch and the javadocs > reappeared. > > The main site is working - I made small change and the content updated. > > I guessed that the subdir target "documentation/javadoc" needs to exist. > > That seems to have done the trick and the dummy file > "/documentation/javadoc/file" exists after publication. Looks like the > javadoc branch is copied into the published site, not replace the subdir. > > If so, maybe we can have /documentation/javadoc/__index.md. > > Andy > > On 20/06/2021 14:43, Aaron Coburn wrote: > > It seems the Javadocs for Jena have all gone missing: > > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/javadoc/arq/ > > > > Are they just in a different location now? (If so, we should change the > > links from the home page) > > > > Thanks, Aaron > > > > > >
