[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17378209#comment-17378209
]
Martynas Jusevičius edited comment on JENA-2130 at 7/9/21, 5:45 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand why all the protocols are being lumped together under
{{RDFConnection}} instead of having dedicated interfaces as before? To me
that's bad OO design.
There is no such thing as "connection" in the RDF world, but there are
endpoints for different protocols, and their "accessors" or clients or what you
want to call them.
was (Author: graphity):
I don't understand why all the protocols are being lumped together under
{{RDFConnection}} instead of having dedicated interfaces as before? To me
that's bad OO design.
There is no such thing as "connection" in the RDF world, but there are
endpoints (and their "accessors" or clients or what you want to call them).
> GSP. Graph Store Protocol client using java.net.http
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-2130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2130
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ, SPARQL
> Affects Versions: Jena 4.1.0
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Major
>
> All GSP usage.
> {{DatasetAccessor}} and {{DatasetGraphAccessor}} are already deprecated.
> Normally, GSP will be used via {{RDFConnection}} and {{RDFLink}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
