I have created a fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213
this involves an upgrade to SIS1.1 How are we going to include this in Jena 4.4.0? Should I ask for a pull request? Marco On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:07 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Things are looking on-track for a release. > > A couple of JIRA have come in recently - one's now got a PR, and the > LiteralLabel looks OK, just needs trying out. > > Builds: > > Some of the Jenkins is broken (that take 2 mins ... which is a little > too fast!) and despite "success" the snapshot repos is unchanged. > There's a suspicious warning from Jenkins: INFRA-22769 and it seems to > only touch the top level directory. > > I have done a snapshot deploy directly (from local maven run, not > jenkins) with no issues. > > GH actions work ... there does seem to be one timing related issue in > test cleanup in jena-fuseki-webaccess when the GH actions might be under > load. It does not look to be related to what is being tested (deleting > databases). > > Andy > > On 15/01/2022 22:08, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > > Looks good to me! > > > > Thanks Andy > > Bruno > > > > On Sunday, 16 January 2022, 06:53:40 am NZDT, Andy Seaborne < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > The idea was to have 4.4.0 quite soon because the Fuseki UI work only > > just missing 4.3.0 > > > > Despite everything, we seem to be still on track for end-ish January! > > > > Resolved tickets for 4.4.0: > > https://s.apache.org/jena-4.4.0-jira > > > > Does that fit with PMC members? > > > > Andy > > > > Contributions: > > > > Erich Bremer > > Update of Titanium. > > > > == Fuseki: > > > > More on Fuseki : > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rrvy84t79ljhpxkpccc7l70tgt9o21lk > > > > * New UI > > > > A rewritten UI using Vue. Much better easier to take forward and much > > easier to manage the dependencies and licensing. > > > > Thanks Bruno! > > > > * TDB2 > > > > The UI options for databases are "in-memory" and "TDB2". > > > > TDB1 is not a visible option. > > > > * Fuseki modules > > > > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/fuseki2/fuseki-modules > > > > * WAR file > > > > The WAR file will be on the project downloads page, not in the > > apache-jena-fuseki assembled file. This halves the size of the zip/tar.gz > > > > It is part of evolving Fuseki in the future so the standalone server is > > Fuseki Main + Fuseki modules for UI and administration. > > > > The WAR file will remain while it is being used but it's incompatible > > with drop-in Fuseki-module extensions. > > > > * Tomcat 10 > > > > The WAR file is not compatible with Tomcat 10 which is using "jakarta" > > APIs, not "javax" APIs. > > > > There is a conversion tool > > https://tomcat.apache.org/download-migration.cgi > > is someone would like to try it out. > > > > ** HTML file upload. > > > > The HTML file upload functionality, "serviceUpload", is no longer > > included in new default configurations. > > > > This is not GSP. GSP does support multifile uploads. > > > > == Assembler for GeoSPARQL > > > > This makes it easier to use GeoPSARQL in a plain Fuseki. > > > > == xloader > > > > TDB2 xloader has usability improvements based on our wikidata testing by > > Øyvind, Lorenz and Marco, including full wikiData (16.7B triples) as > > well as "truthy" (6.6B triples). > > > > In particular, it now has "--threads=" -- Lorenz reported goo > > improvements (if the server has the hardware!). > > > > > > TDB1 xloader is still the old tdbloader2 with some of the earlier > > improvements of TDB2 xloader. > > > > For me, TDB2 is the preferred database. > > TDB1 exists because it is out there; it may get back ports, it may not. > > > > == Other: > > > > Dependencies up to date: log4j 2.17.1; Update to Titanium 1.2.0 > > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
