Build passed from tag, with:

Apache Maven 3.8.2 (ea98e05a04480131370aa0c110b8c54cf726c06f)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.2
Java version: 11.0.13, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-96-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"


Looked inside .jar and .tar.gz files in the dist area (binaries and
sources), and everything looks good (checked the new -ui module, didn't
find node_modules or any other unnecessary files). The jena-fuseki-ui
module creates a jar that only contains metadata. Maybe we could skip
releasing it in the future? I think as it is, it should be available in the
Maven repository as a jar dependency for users, even though it's not usable
in any way in Java I think.

Tried running the WAR from the dist area, using Docker, with the following
Dockerfile.

```
>From tomcat:9.0.58-jre11-openjdk-slim
ADD ./jena-fuseki-war-4.4.0.war /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/ROOT.war
```

It started fine, and loaded the UI when browsing http://localhost:8080/.
However, when trying to create datasets I'm getting 403. Same for browsing
Tasks. Couldn't find anything in the tomcat logs.

Any idea of what I could be doing wrong?

-Bruno


On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 07:53, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.4.0.
> This is the first proposed release candidate.
>
> The deadline is
>
>       Monday, 31st January December 2021 at 19:00 UTC.
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>          [ ] +1 Approve the release
>          [ ]  0 Don't care
>          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
>
> ==== Items in this release
>
> ****
>
> The main item in this release is the updated Fuseki UI thanks to work by
> Bruno.
>
> This can be tested by downloading
> "org/apache/jena/apache-jena-fuseki/4.4.0/" zip or tar.gz from the
> staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1049
>
> ****
>
> As general maintenance for the project:
>
> Apache log4j is at 2.17.1
> Apache Lucene: is updated to 8.10.1 -> 8.11.1
> Titanium JSON-LD updated 1.1.0 -> 1.2.0
>
> as well as all other dependences being checked for updates.
>
> To get valid javadoc, the build was done with Java17 cross-compiling to
> <release>11</release>. A dry-run with java11 was done to check no Java17
> library calls had crept in.
>
> The war file for Fuseki is no longer in the apache-jena-fuseki download.
> Instead, it is available from the downloads page (links to be updated
> when the release happens).
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/
>
> The Fuseki war file does not work in Tomcat10 due to the javax->jakarta
> switchover. In theory, the Tomcat provided converter should work.
> https://tomcat.apache.org/download-migration.cgi
>
>
> This release includes the versions of the TDB2 xloader used to load
> 16.6B triples (WikiData all) into TDB2 and loading truthy on modest
> hardware. Thanks to Marco, Lorenz and Øyvind for running Wikidata load
> trails.
>
> Fuseki: serviceUpload is no longer added in a default configuration.
> This is not SPARQL GSP. GSP (POST/PUT) does accept HTML file uploads as
> well as POST/PUT by content-type.
>
> ==== Release Vote
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
>
> Staging repository:
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1049
>
> Proposed dist/ area:
>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git commit (browser URL):
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/80c61f2d40
>
> Git Commit Hash:
>    80c61f2d405e8b1fff74eb6ff72949fdc7718000
>
> Git Commit Tag:
>    jena-4.4.0
>
> This vote will be open until at least
>
>       Monday, 31st January December 2021 at 19:00 UTC.
>
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above.
>
> Thanks,
>
>        Andy
>
> Checking needed:
>
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
> + can the source archive be built?
>            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>

Reply via email to