[x] +1 Approve the release (binding) Verified signatures Verified checksums Built jena from source archive using Java 11 and Maven 3.8.1 All artifacts contain LICENSE and NOTICE files
Thanks, Aaron On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 1:53 AM Bruno Kinoshita <[email protected]> wrote: > [x] +1 Approve the release > > Thanks > Bruno > > On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 03:18, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.5.0. > > This is the first release candidate. > > > > The deadline is > > > > Wednesday, 4th May 2022 at 18:00 UTC > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > > > ==== Items in this release > > > > * New, faster, streaming, more robust JSON result set reader. > > > > * Switch to JSON-LD 1.1 as the JSON-LD default. > > > > To get valid javadoc, the build was done with Java17 cross-compiling to > > <release>11</release>. A dry-run with java11 was done to check that no > > Java17 library calls had crept in. > > > > ==== Release Vote > > > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > > Please download and test the proposed release. > > > > Staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1052 > > > > Proposed dist/ area: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > > > > Keys: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > > > Git commit (browser URL):91c399148f > > https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/91c399148f > > > > Git Commit Hash: > > 91c399148f4f94c19517a88eb8c85db83fdb1342 > > > > Git Commit Tag: > > jena-4.5.0 > > > > This vote will be open until at least > > > > Wednesday, 4th May 2022 at 18:00 UTC > > > > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work > > for you, please email within the schedule above. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andy > > > > Checking: > > > > + are the GPG signatures fine? > > + are the checksums correct? > > + is there a source archive? > > + can the source archive be built? > > (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > > (both source and binary artifacts)? > > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > >
