Like this?

https://github.com/afs/jena/blob/reorg/archived-modules.md

On 10/09/2022 13:30, Andy Seaborne wrote:


On 09/09/2022 00:17, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
Sounds good.

Is there a reason for not removing the directories, instead of moving to
archive? If we have a note in the README telling users who came looking for
these modules that they are now in the archive folder; we could instead
tell them to use git? Maybe point to the last commit or tag, use a GitHub
link, etc?

No specific reason except it's just a "git mv".

We could have a single file that takes the information already in the separate README files.

They have date of retirement and git commit for the last code before git rm. Also text in most of them:
"""
Retired modules can be incorporated back into Jena releases if there is sufficient activity to maintain the code over the long term.
"""

     Andy


Thanks
Bruno

On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 23:29, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

1/ We have a number of retired modules:

    apache-jena-osgi
    jena-csv
    jena-elephas
    jena-fuseki1
    jena-maven-tools
    jena-sdb
    jena-spatial
    jena-text-es

Each has a README that explains how to retrieve the code from git.

That's 8 of total of 29 top level modules.

Proposal: move these in an "archive/" directory.


2/ Move jena-tdb2 up to the top level from inside jena-db/ to make it
more findable. (After PR #1514 which makes


3/ It is tempting to change jena-tdb/ directory to jena-tdb1/ (maven
artifact not renamed) as well for clarity.


      Andy


Reply via email to