+1 and I confirm the tests are now all passing on my environment

Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.6, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "5.15.0-70-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"

Thank you Andy!


On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 11:27, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.8.0.
> This is the second release candidate.
>
> The deadline is
>
>      Sunday, 23rd April 2023 at 12:00 UTC
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>          [ ] +1 Approve the release
>          [ ]  0 Don't care
>          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> ==== Items in this release
>
> == RC 2
>
> a/ Fix the initialization issue found in RC1
> https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1847
>
> b/ GH-1749: Replacing webpack chunks by Vite rollup
>
> c/ fix and test for JENA-2352
>
> == RC 1
>
> https://s.apache.org/jena-4.8.0-issues
>
> * The RDF/XML parser has been converted to use the
>    Jena IRI abstraction IRIx.
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1773
>
> This is the first part of a move to convert the RDF/XML parser to be
> consistent with the rest of Jena parsing
>
> 1. unified IRI treatment of error handling and reporting throughout Jena
> 2. improve maintainability
> 3. allow for alternative providers of IRI functionality
>
> * Add CHANGES.txt
> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/main/CHANGES.txt
>    It has been backfilled with announcement message from 4.0.0 onwards.
>    It will be updated after the release - it has a link to [ANN]
>
> * Search facility on the Jena website
>
> @lucasvr (Lucas C. Villa Real) provided an analysis and improvement to
> bulk loading operations.
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1803
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1819
>
> @wjl110 - Shiro upgrade PR#1728
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1728
>
> Lucene upgrade from 9.4.2 to 9.5.0
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1740
>    https://lists.apache.org/thread/696xgpyg2441kzdowmp1b40tshctw25c
>
> @dplagge (Daniel Plagge) - Delta graph fix
> https://github.com/apache/jena/issue/1751
>
> SimonBin: Fix for sharing link in Fuseki and YASGE
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1745
>
> Improved performance of "GRAPH ?g {}" (all graph names)
> Prefix scan -- GRAPH ?G
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1639
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1655
>
> @nichtich (Jakob Voß) jena-site improvements:
>    https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/151
>
> @sverholen JENA-2350 Pass JsonLdOptions to titanium for json-ld 1.1
>
> ==== Release Vote
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
>
> Staging repository:
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1058
>
> Proposed dist/ area:
>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>
> Keys:
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> Git commit (browser URL):
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/198e6950c7
>
> Git Commit Hash:
>    198e6950c7652ffe68c9171bc5ed92c69210c60a
>
> Git Commit Tag:
>    jena-4.8.0
>
> This vote will be open until at least
>
>    Sunday, 23rd April 2023 at 12:00 UTC
>
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above.
>
>      Thanks,
>      Andy
>
> Checking:
>
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
> + can the source archive be built?
>            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>

Reply via email to