On 20/04/2024 17:07, Andy Seaborne wrote:
PMC,
We've received a contribution which includes OWL2 support.
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2160 "Support for OWL2"
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2420 "jena-ontapi module"
README:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2420/files#diff-c8f3f6da514f1c8fd82f305b56cfac2b95784632984810e01943bfd16befe82a
The contribution is self-contained - it doesn't alter any other part of
the Jena code base.
It is a significant addition so I think we need to get a Software Grant
for it to keep everything neat and tidy process-wise.
Having read the intellectual property clearance process [1] and looked
at the list of previous contributions in the Foundation, I don't now
think we need a Software Grant. While the CCLA has a "Software Grant"
section, the ICLA does not.
We would need one there was an owning organisation involved, but here we
have an individual contribution, so the contributor would be signing
both ICLA and Software Grant - nothing is gained.
[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
Andy
The PR builds (maven + OpenJDK), some Javadoc warnings.
It doesn't compile in Eclipse. It looks like the errors are generics
related.
Questions about the technical content of the contribution on the PR please.
Andy
