+1 now also tested the release with an application and the fuseki release
only grew by 2mb.

Marco

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:15 AM Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 builds for me. not tested with products yet
>
> Some observations: The build took ~ 4min for a fresh repo. skipped
> javadoc. all fine with Maven 3.9.6. jdk 21 oracle on linux. very smooth.
>
> The disk size of Jena continues to grow substantially. Just a
> cursory reading for Jena 4.10 gives me 1.1 GB on disk after the build. Jena
> 5.1.0 already goes up to 1.4GB  and Jena 5.2.0 now is at 1.6GB. This while
> my application use of Jena hasn't changed much in the last 2 years.
> (stable) system just scaled up data size (linear) in production.
>
> Best,
> Marco
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 9:12 AM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a vote on the first release candidate for
>> Apache Jena version 5.2.0.
>>
>> ==== Release Vote
>>
>> This vote will be open until at least
>>
>>      Tuesday 15th October, 2024 at 12:00 UTC
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>>          [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>          [ ]  0 Don't care
>>          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
>> Please download and test the proposed release. See the checklist below.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1066
>>
>> Proposed dist/ area:
>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
>>
>> Keys:
>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Git commit (browser URL):
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/58e6cf3cd0
>>
>> Git Commit Hash:
>>    58e6cf3cd020fc3d95b7f29197bf1a0410c220db
>>
>> Git Commit Tag:
>>    jena-5.2.0
>>
>> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
>> for you, please email within the schedule above.
>>
>> ==== In this release
>>
>> Issues in this release:
>>
>>    https://s.apache.org/jena-5.2.0-issues
>>
>> The main feature for Jena 5.2.0 is an implementation of CDT "Composite
>> Datatype Literals", contributed by Olaf Hartig and others from AWSlabs.
>> This is "experimental" meaning it is subject to change.  There should be
>> no impact if the feature is not used.
>>
>> The release also includes:
>>
>> * hash join improvements
>> * performance improvements for RDF/XML parsing, and for command startup.
>> * refinement of jena-ontapi
>>
>> ==== Contributions
>>
>> CDT: Composite Datatype Literals
>> Olaf Hartig (@Hartig) et al.
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2518
>>    https://github.com/w3c/sparql-dev/tree/main/SEP/SEP-0009
>>    https://github.com/awslabs/SPARQL-CDTs
>>
>> Hash join improvements.
>>    @Aklakan Claus Stadler
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2404
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2405
>>
>> GH-2580: Added parseCheck flags to query and update exec builders
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2580
>> This helps when dealing with vendor extensions to SPARQL.
>>    @Aklakan Claus Stadler
>>
>> GH-2578: Fix Quad.isTriple() handling in JenaTitanium
>>    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2578
>>    @Ostrzyciel Piotr Sowiński
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Checking:
>>
>> + are the GPG signatures fine?
>> + are the checksums correct?
>> + is there a source archive?
>> + can the source archive be built?
>>            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
>> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>>            (both source and binary artifacts)?
>> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
>> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
>> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
>
>
>

-- 


---
Marco Neumann

Reply via email to