On 14/10/2024 12:09, Arne Bernhardt wrote:
> Since I extended the regression tests in jena-benchmarks-jmh to
> include Jena 5.1 additionally to Jena 4.8, I may be partly
> responsible for some growth here....
> Should I open an issue to remove Jena 4.8 from jena-benchmarks-jmh?
It does not add much AFAICS.
What is noticeable is having bsbm-1m.nt.gz in the release source. It's
not even a very large file by data standards (only 27M) and it's 50% of
the release.
It's not necessary to have access to it to be able to build the source
code so I don;t think we need to make it part of the release.
I just asked infra on slack about how to handle such files (and we're
not exactly "big data" here!). I got pointed to
https://nightlies.apache.org/ (it is SVN so no git file size issues)
which looks like a possibility for making data files for benchmarking
for collaborators. We could even put up some larger files --
27M bsbm-1m.nt.gz
660M bsbm-25m.nt.gz
Andy
