Hello Sebb, I just did it. By the way if you have some time to look at: - 47850 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850> - 43294 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43294> - 45132 <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45132>
Regards Philippe On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 November 2011 06:22, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > In fact it would be better if version coule have Many values Like Jira > > affects field. > > Unfortunately it does not, so we have to live with it. > > > What I generally did was to Check issue existed in last release. > > If it does not occur in the last release, then generally the bug > should be marked as fixed, otherwise the version should be left alone > please. > > > I did this to Kind of Mark bugs as still accurate but i agrée with you > > losing initial version is not great. > > Could you restore the orignal versions please? > > > Regards > > Philippe > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: sebb > > Date: Monday, November 14, 2011 > > Subject: Updates to Bugzilla issues > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > On 14 November 2011 01:22, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's helpful to try and mark up Bugzilla issues that are duplicates, > >> but I think it generally makes more sense to close the more recent one > >> as the duplicate, not the older one. > > > > Also, I think it makes more sense to leave the Version field as > > originally provided. > > > > Otherwise, every open bug is going to have to be updated with every > > new release, and the original version against which the bug was > > reported is lost. > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
